Historically, technology was far less reliable. Computers crashed, internet connections were inconsistent, and fixing things often required trial and error. Tinkering with technology, whether troubleshooting software, repairing hardware, or experimenting with early programming, built natural resilience. Today, much of that struggle has been eliminated by intuitive interfaces and automation. While this improves efficiency, it also removes opportunities for students to develop persistence. In STEM education, resilience is fostered by debugging code, iterating on engineering designs, and troubleshooting robotics failures, requiring students to try, fail, and try again.
Traditional education often emphasizes fixed answers and standardized processes. STEM education, in contrast, requires students to adapt their approach based on real-world constraints. Whether designing a functional robot, optimizing an algorithm, or engineering a structure within material limitations, students must learn to adjust their methods when faced with unexpected outcomes. This problem-solving mindset, learning to work with constraints, think creatively, and pivot when necessary, is essential in today’s fast-changing world, where predefined solutions are rare.
While the availability of instant information has made knowledge more accessible, it has also diminished the need for deep exploration. In the past, curiosity was driven by a lack of information, leading to hands-on experimentation and creative problem-solving. Today, students can look up answers instantly, reducing the incentive to wonder about how things work. STEM education reignites this sense of curiosity by encouraging students to ask their own questions, test hypotheses, and explore concepts beyond what is presented to them. Beyond academics, maintaining a sense of wonder is crucial for lifelong learning, discovery, and innovation.